In a significant development, a Delhi court has directed the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against journalist Rana Ayyub. The order comes in response to a complaint filed by lawyer Amita Sachdeva, accusing Ayyub of insulting Hindu deities, spreading anti-India sentiment, and promoting hostility through her posts on the social media platform ‘X’ (formerly Twitter).

Chief Judicial Magistrate Himanshu Raman Singh of Saket Courts observed that “prima-facie” cognizable offenses were made out against Ayyub. The court invoked Sections 153A (promoting enmity between different groups), 295A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings), and 505 (statements conducing public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The court stated, “In view of the facts and circumstances, the complaint discloses the commission of cognizable offenses for which an FIR is warranted. The SHO Cyber Police Station, South, is directed to convert the contents of the complaint into an FIR and investigate the matter fairly.”

Background of the Case
The complaint against Ayyub was filed on November 11, 2023, by Amita Sachdeva through the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. Sachdeva alleged that Ayyub had consistently used her social media platform to insult Hindu deities, malign India’s unity, and promote hostility toward the nation and its citizens, including the Indian Army.

Despite repeated follow-ups, no action was taken on her complaint, prompting Sachdeva to file an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) seeking the registration of an FIR.

Ayyub’s Controversial Past
Rana Ayyub has been a controversial figure, often accused of harboring anti-Hindu and anti-India sentiments. She has also faced allegations of misusing funds collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reports suggest that donations meant for COVID relief were diverted for personal use, raising serious questions about her credibility and intentions.

Court’s Observations
The court noted that the preliminary inquiry conducted by the authorities had deemed the offense as non-cognizable. However, the judge emphasized the gravity of the allegations and the need for a thorough investigation.

“Considering the gravity of the allegations, the Court is of the view that it is expedient to order an investigation in the present matter in exercise of the judicial power under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. The facts pleaded by the complainant are such that they necessitate the intervention of State machinery in the form of police investigation, as the complainant would not be in a position to collect evidence independently,” the court observed.

Next Steps
The Cyber Police Station in South Delhi has been directed to register the FIR and conduct a fair investigation into the matter. The case has sparked widespread debate on freedom of expression, religious sentiments, and the legal boundaries of social media conduct in India.